Introduction
Current arrangements
New developments
A pattern for the future
Difficulties and opportunities
An outline model for the education of Practitioners in Emergency Care
Categories of professional and employment possibilities
Cost implications
Summary of recommendations
References
 

The Future Role and Education of Paramedic Ambulance Service Personnel (Emerging Concepts)

Publications > The future role... > Introduction

1. Introduction

1.1 Emergency prehospital care can have a profound influence on morbidity and mortality of those critically injured. Whilst ambulance paramedics are expected to treat a wide range of medical, surgical and obstetric emergencies, their additional training (over and above their basic skills and operational experience) is relatively modest, with less than 300 hours initially, followed by a mandatory 16 hour annual refresher course. Moreover, practical experience is also limited. For example on average each paramedic may see one case of serious trauma per month [6] and only a few cases of cardiac arrest each year. Maintaining paramedic skills and improving their continuing education are therefore recognised as areas that present significant challenges.

1.2 The question of whether or not to treat the patient before transporting to hospital can be at least as important as knowing how to treat the patient. The challenge for paramedics to gain adequate knowledge for an accurate assessment of the patient's condition, to acquire the skills for safe management, to maintain both, and to develop sound clinical judgement is already considerable. Wider health care developments are likely to make it increasingly so in the future. Such developments include:-
  • Prioritisation and patient help-line services which would offer support on those occasions when, after assessment and treatment, transport of the patient to hospital is deemed to be unnecessary.
  • Increased specialisation which often results in longer ambulance journeys during which more extensive care and more sophisticated treatment is required.
  • The recognition of a place for "immediate transport" policies, especially for trauma when the over-riding priority may be urgent treatment in hospital. The balance against the need sometimes to spend time wisely at the scene requires careful assessment and sound judgement. [7]
  • Equity issues especially in relation to remote and rural communities where conventional emergency services may not be fully effective.
  • Changes in the provision of primary care and the diminution in numbers of home visits by general practitioners associated with the establishment of out-of-hours cooperatives.

1.3 Incomplete data sources, problems of isolating the influence of individual components in a continuum of care, and the short time during which the patient is usually in the care of ambulance personnel are examples of the factors which make prehospital research particularly difficult. Thus, national and international evidence of impact on patient outcome remains inconclusive. A number of recent UK studies [6,8-10] have failed to show any reduction in mortality to hospital discharge as a result of paramedic intervention, at least with regard to trauma. Evidence does exist, however, that morbidity may be influenced favourably. It is not only outcomes that are matters of contention: the evidence base for many pre-hospital practices is generally recognised as seriously deficient. [11]

Next >>
     
    ©2007 JRCALC | SITE BY EMUNKI
 
Meetings held at Churchill House
 
Contact

Constitution
 
 

Guidelines - Clarifications
 

Clinical practice guideline updates
 

New e-mail alert service from JRCALC - click here to register